EVALUATION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE OF PT SOLUSI BANGUN INDONESIA TBK CILACAP PLANT BEFORE AND AFTER THE NAME CHANGE

Authors

  • Dian Anggraeni Universitas Diponegoro

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Evaluation, GRI G4, Disclosure

Abstract

This study evaluates CSR disclosure through the dimensions of implementation and reporting using the GRI G4 framework. The results of the study showed that (1) CSR implementation of Solusi Bangun Indonesia Tbk (SBI) Cilacap Plant of 2017 was said to be good through various programs and approaches, as proven by a Community Satisfaction Index of 84.2%; (2) CSR implementation compliance of SBI Cilacap was high because under conditions of poor financial conditions of 2018, the CSR program continued to be implemented in accordance with the rules of law. SBI Cilacap has complied with Law Number 40 of 2007 and Government Regulation Number 47 of 2012; (3) CSR implementation of SBI Cilacap, in terms of ISO 26000, was appropriate; (4) the level of sustainability reports disclosure of Holcim Indonesia of 2017, based on the GRI G4 framework as a whole reached 38%, environmental categories disclosure reached 62%, while economic and social disclosures only reached 22% and 25%. After the name changed as Solusi Bangun Indonesia of 2019, the level of sustainability reports disclosure of 2019, based on the GRI G4 framework as a whole reached 41%, environmental categories disclosure reached 62%, while economic 33% and social disclosures reached 27%. One of the focuses of this research was to evaluate the CSR implementation in a comprehensive manner through the dimensions of implementation and reporting before and after the name change. No previous studies have examined both of them simultaneously.

References

Ariwendha, Ezra dan Hasyir, Dede A. 2017. Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja CSR Berdasarkan Evaluasi Laporan Berkelanjutan (Studi Kasus Pada PT Antam (Persero) Tbk). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan (JAK) UNPAD, 17(1), 1-13.

Ashdiana, I Made. 24 Maret 2015. Di Asia, Kesadaran CSR Meningkat. Kompas.com,. . (https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2015/03/24/161653826/Di.Asia.Kesadaran.CSR.Meningkat, 2 Agustus 2020).

Asniwaty, Bese. 2010. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) PT. Pupuk Kaltim. Jurnal EKSIS, 6(1), 1266-1267.

Bungin, Burhan. 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Crossroads Global Hand. (https://www.globalhand.org/en/browse/csr/resource/document/27942, 2 Agustus 2020).

Cheng, Wong Lai and Ahmad, Jamilah. 2010. Intercorporating Stakeholder Approach in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): A Case Study at Multinasional Corporations (MNCs) in Penang”. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(4), 593-610.

Cho, Charles H., Michelon, Giovanna., Patten, Dennis M., Robets, Robin W. 2015. CSR Disclosure: The More Things Change?. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 28(1), 14-35.

Cresswell, J.W. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Deegan, Craig. 2004. Financial Accounting Theory. Australia: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.

Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Global Reporting Initiatives. 2013. Principles for Defining Report Content. (https://www.globalreporting.org/information/sector-guidance/Pages/default.aspx ,2 Agustus 2020).

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., Bailey, A., 2011. Qualitative Research Methods. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.

ISO 26000. 2010. “Guidance on Social Responsibility”. https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html , 2 Agustus 2020).

Jankalova, Miriam. 2016. “Approaches to The Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility”. Procedia Economic and Finance, 39, 580-587.

Kirana, Intan. 2013. Peranan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Bidang Lingkungan dalam Menunjang Perolehan Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan (PROPER) PT Surya Kertas. Jurnal Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 2(2), 1-18.

Kotler, Philip dan Lee Nancy. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing The Most Good For Your Company And Your Case. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Krippendorff, Klaus. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction Its Metodology. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Miles, Matthew. B, Huberman, A. Michael, Johny saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis 3rd edition. USA: SAGE Publications.

Mujizat, Al. “Perkembangan CSR di Indonesia”. Cipta Daya Consulting. (http://www.ciptadayaconsulting.net/2016/12/perkembangan-csr-di-indonesia.html, 2 Agustus 2020).

Nurjanah, Adhianty dan Yulianti, Frizki. Motif Pelaksanaan Corporate Social Responsibility Perusahaan (Studi Kasus: CSR PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk Cilacap Plant dan CSR Delegation Europian Union to Malaysia). Chanel Jurnal Komunikasi, 6(2), 139-150.

Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia No. 6 Tahun 2013 tentang PROPER.

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 47 Tahun 2012 tentang Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perseroan Terbatas.

Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) No. 1 Tahun 2013 tentang Penyajian Laporan Keuangan.

Prihatiningtias, YW dan Dayanti, N. 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Firm Financial Performance in Mining and Natural Resources Industry. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 22(1), 35-38.

PT Solusi Bangun Indonesia.( https://www.solusibangunindonesia.com, 2 Agustus 2020).

Robert, R. Keatinge. 1992. The Limited Liability Company: A Study of The Emerging Entity. Business Lawyer Journal, 47, 357.

Rohmah, Fauziyatur. 2013. Analisis Penerapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan (Studi Kasus PT Hanjaya Mandala Sampoerna Tbk). Jurnal Akuntansi UNESA, 2(1), 1-20.

Roza, Suswita. 2014. Perencanaan, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi Program CSR. Mankeu,3(1), 374-463.

Sekaran, Uma, dan Bougie, Roger. 2013. Research Methods for Business. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Sethi, S.P., Martell, T.F., Demir, M. 2017. An Evaluation of the Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports by Some of The World’s Largest Financial Institutions. Journal Business Ethics 140, 787-805.

Setiani, Eko Putri. 2018. Analisis Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dalam Sustainability Report pada Perusahaan High Profile dan Low Profile. Tesis Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Silviani, Ria dan Panggabean, Rosita R. 2015. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Corporate Social Responsibility di PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Binus Business Review, 6(2), 241-249.

Sukmadinata, N.S. 2011. Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Remaja Rosadakarya.

Tuxworth, B. 2013. Global Reporting Initiative: a New Framework? (https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/global-reporting-initiative-updates, 5 Agustus 2020).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (PT).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal.

Usman, A.B., dan Afza, N. 2015. Corporate Social Responsibility Practice and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence From Nigeria Companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 749-763.

Waagstein, P.R. 2011. The Mandatory Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 455-466.

Yin, R.K. 2014. Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 5th ed. California: SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-17