Corporate Life Cycle on Real Earnings Management: Evidence From Indonesia

Authors

  • Paradisa Sukma Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/jpensi.v11i1.2806

Keywords:

Corporate Life Cycle, Real Earnings Management, Introduction Phases, Growth Phases, Maturity Phases, Decline Phases

Abstract

This study examines the effect of the Corporate Life Cycle on Real Earnings Management (REM) in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2023–2024. The Corporate Life Cycle is classified into Introduction, Growth, Mature, Shake-out, and Decline based on Dickinson (2011), with Shake-out as the reference category. The sample consists of 205 firms with 410 firm-year observations. Multiple linear regression is employed using firm size, leverage, and profitability as control variables. The results indicate that the Mature stage has a significant positive effect on REM, while the Decline stage has a significant negative effect. The Introduction and Growth stages do not significantly affect REM. Firm size negatively affects REM, whereas leverage and profitability are insignificant. These findings suggest that REM practices vary across corporate life cycle stages.

References

[1] C. Xu, H. Zhang, J. Hao, and L. Guo, “Real Earnings Management in bankrupt firms,” Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 22–38, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jcaf.22483.

[2] A. Habib, P. K. Biswas, and D. Ranasinghe, “Real Earnings Management and idiosyncratic return volatility,” Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 44, no. 2/3, pp. 109–132, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1108/JAL-11-2021-0016.

[3] G. Can, “Do Life-Cycles Affect Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Emerging Market,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 7, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1854147.

[4] V. Dickinson, “Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle,” The Accounting Review, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1969–1994, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.2308/accr-10130.

[5] M. Hafez and A. Hasaneen, “Real Earnings Management under Company Life Cycle: Evidence from Egyptian pharmaceutical manufacturing companies,” MSA-Management Sciences Journal, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 163–190, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.21608/msamsj.2023.250068.1038.

[6] L. Michalkova, “Does the corporate life cycle affect earnings management? Evidence from Central European countries,” SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 129, p. 03020, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1051/shsconf/202112903020.

[7] S. Roychowdhury, “Earnings management through real activities manipulation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 335–370, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002.

[8] C. M. da S. Roma, L. C. Louzada, P. M. da S. Roma, H. Goto, and W. Souma, “Earnings management, policy uncertainty and firm life cycle stages: evidence from publicly traded companies in the USA and Brazil,” Journal of Financial Economic Policy, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 371–390, May 2021, doi: 10.1108/JFEP-02-2020-0031.

[9] A. Al Hadi and A. Alazzani, “Corporate life cycles and Analyst Recommendations,” Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 137–151, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1002/jcaf.22778.

[10] N. Nagar and S. Radhakrishnan, “Firm Life Cycle and Real-Activity Based Earnings Management,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2701680.

[11] M. Comporek, “Accrual-based earnings management and organizational life cycles: Two-dimensional analysis,” International Entrepreneurship Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–108, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.15678/IER.2023.0901.07.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28